Plymouth got a little more organized in 2012; it erected its first industrial wind turbine and fielded more requests for solar fields. Plans to build a retail center behind Job Lot in West Plymouth resurfaced, and sand and gravel operations continued.
It was also the year of splitting parcels in half to build one more house, medical office buildings, townhouses and illegal additions.
Plans for a downtown parking garage behind Memorial Hall inched forward. And 2012 closed out with a bang when the owner of Waverly Oaks Golf Club off Long Pond Road filed plans for a subdivision on the course, effectively ending any speculation the property would still be used someday as a movie studio site.
Balboni LLC at Camelot Park erected Plymouth’s first industrial-sized wind turbine. It’s 364 feet high but not close to any residences, so it appeared without much fanfare (pun intended). A small wind turbine was erected at 185 Center Hill Road, but that wasn’t large enough to generate much hot air.
Meanwhile, all but one appeal of Future Wind Generations’ four approved turbines for 810 Head of the Bay Road were settled this year. Associated Wind Developers’ approved wind turbine at 143 Hedges Pond Road is also under appeal and yet to be constructed. Colony Place LLC’s proposal for a wind turbine generated opposition, but its approval was not appealed, probably because the company owns Colony Place and all the buildings therein.
The push back has been hefty, not just from abutters but from legislators like Senate President Therese Murray, D-Plymouth, and Rep. Vinny deMacedo, R-Plymouth, who say industrial-sized wind turbines just don’t belong in residential areas. A contradictory state study both acknowledged possible health impacts from these behemoths and denied them. Then a Maine study came right out and said wind turbines can be a health hazard because they can impact sleep.
So, some developers tried a different tack this year, pushing for solar instead. It came as some surprise to residents when they learned that solar farms are allowed uses that don’t require special permits or approvals beyond a sign off on site-plan review. In March, Renewable Energy Development Partners LLC announced plans to construct a three-megawatt solar field on a 17-acre Herring Pond Road parcel. Site plan review on the project was approved and it was given the green light. Then, in May, the Carreau Family Trust, which operates the Ellis Haven Campground, announced its plans for a one-half megawatt solar field off South Meadow Road. The Planning Board voted unanimously to approve the site plan for the project. By August, another solar developer had stepped forward. This time it was Sage Stone proposing a 37-acre solar field off Old Sandwich Road. Planning Board members bemoaned the loss of woodlands to these uses, but there wasn’t much they could do about it.
In other parts of town, 2012 was ushered in with the rise of the medical office building, as these projects sprung up in the Industrial Park next to the Registry of Motor Vehicles, on the Jordan Hospital property and, most recently, at Cordage Park. These plans sounded a more positive note from the town’s planners as the buildings are reasonably attractive and will boost the local economy with additional taxes, require few town services and, possibly, provide some jobs.
Scattered among these projects were several proposals to split a property in half in order to build another home, as Manomet homeowners tried to maximize their land.
And Howland Street weighed in with yet another proposal for townhouses – this time for 22 units in three buildings on land owned by the Stasinos Family Trust, located across from Polar Cat LLC’s property slated to become an 11-unit apartment building. The plans are conceptual at the moment, but Polar Cat’s have been approved.
2012年12月26日 星期三
2012年10月31日 星期三
Greens deal opens way for delayed national poker machine reform
CONTROVERSIAL watered down national poker machine reforms are set to go ahead after the Greens finally agreed to back the Gillard government's scheme, which will also give the green light for a trial of mandatory precommitment in the ACT.
After months of negotiation, and several offers from the Greens to support the bill if $1 bets were accommodated, the reforms will eventually lead to every poker machine in Australia offer punters the option to preset how much they are willing to lose.
This morning Families Minister Jenny Macklin introduced the bill, which was referred to a special standing parliamentary committee on gambling for inquiry.
The committee will report back within weeks so the bill can be voted on in the final sitting week of the year later this month.
From the end of next year the bill will require precommitment on all new poker machines, with all machines to be part of a state-linked precommitment system by the end of 2016.
If the trial is conclusive — to be assessed by the Productivity Commission — mandatory precommitment can be activated on all machines with a "the flick of a switch."
The bill also sets a $250 daily withdrawal limit from ATMs in gaming venues (excluding casinos) from next May.
Long time anti-pokies campaign Nick Xenophon told ABC radio that the bill was "piss weak".
Greens gambling spokesman, and public health doctor, Richard Di Natale said the party agreed to back the bill in exchange for government funding of a national gambling research centre.
The centre will cost $1.5 million a year and Ms Macklin said it would begin work in July under the auspices of the Australian Institute of Family Studies.
"These pokies reforms are a long way short of what is needed to curb problem gambling but at least we've made some progress," Senator Di Natale said.
"For the first time we've got national legislation to tackle the scourge of problem gambling."
Senator Di Natale attacked the government for buckling under pressure as well as independent Andrew Wilkie who, he said, "blew" the opportunity for "real reform".
"He should have pushed for $1 bet limits from the start but he let the government steer him towards a policy that was a much harder sell and played right into the hands of the pokies industry," he said.
"For all his bluster about bringing down the government he went to water and we've been left to negotiate a better outcome."
Senator Di Natale said he would continue to support a $1 bet maximum limit on pokies.In January, Prime Minister Julia Gillard reneged on her deal with Mr Wilkie for a national scheme that would force all punters to preset how much they are willing to lose on the pokies.
Facing a multi-million dollar public campaign from the clubs and pokies industry, particularly in marginal NSW and Queensland seats, the government said it did not have support of the parliament to pass the reforms.
Despite Mr Wilkie being duped by the government he has "reluctantly" backed the reforms. Last night he said "sometimes compromise is necessary, and I have no doubt that history will record the limited reforms of this parliament as being the start of the clean-up of an industry that has grown fat on the misery of Australia's most vulnerable people".
After months of negotiation, and several offers from the Greens to support the bill if $1 bets were accommodated, the reforms will eventually lead to every poker machine in Australia offer punters the option to preset how much they are willing to lose.
This morning Families Minister Jenny Macklin introduced the bill, which was referred to a special standing parliamentary committee on gambling for inquiry.
The committee will report back within weeks so the bill can be voted on in the final sitting week of the year later this month.
From the end of next year the bill will require precommitment on all new poker machines, with all machines to be part of a state-linked precommitment system by the end of 2016.
If the trial is conclusive — to be assessed by the Productivity Commission — mandatory precommitment can be activated on all machines with a "the flick of a switch."
The bill also sets a $250 daily withdrawal limit from ATMs in gaming venues (excluding casinos) from next May.
Long time anti-pokies campaign Nick Xenophon told ABC radio that the bill was "piss weak".
Greens gambling spokesman, and public health doctor, Richard Di Natale said the party agreed to back the bill in exchange for government funding of a national gambling research centre.
The centre will cost $1.5 million a year and Ms Macklin said it would begin work in July under the auspices of the Australian Institute of Family Studies.
"These pokies reforms are a long way short of what is needed to curb problem gambling but at least we've made some progress," Senator Di Natale said.
"For the first time we've got national legislation to tackle the scourge of problem gambling."
Senator Di Natale attacked the government for buckling under pressure as well as independent Andrew Wilkie who, he said, "blew" the opportunity for "real reform".
"He should have pushed for $1 bet limits from the start but he let the government steer him towards a policy that was a much harder sell and played right into the hands of the pokies industry," he said.
"For all his bluster about bringing down the government he went to water and we've been left to negotiate a better outcome."
Senator Di Natale said he would continue to support a $1 bet maximum limit on pokies.In January, Prime Minister Julia Gillard reneged on her deal with Mr Wilkie for a national scheme that would force all punters to preset how much they are willing to lose on the pokies.
Facing a multi-million dollar public campaign from the clubs and pokies industry, particularly in marginal NSW and Queensland seats, the government said it did not have support of the parliament to pass the reforms.
Despite Mr Wilkie being duped by the government he has "reluctantly" backed the reforms. Last night he said "sometimes compromise is necessary, and I have no doubt that history will record the limited reforms of this parliament as being the start of the clean-up of an industry that has grown fat on the misery of Australia's most vulnerable people".
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)